Off topic but I think that you will all enjoy this

https://www.youtube.com/embed/Sj-QGdsoelE?ecver=1

Indeed, thanks!

Another great photographer crashes with Jetphotos' high standards: https://forums.jetphotos.com/showthread.php?60400-shaner243-editing-advice https://forums.jetphotos.com/showthread.php?60341-5-photos-are-rejected&p=662338&viewfull=1#post662338 -------------------------------------------------------...

Worrying.

Wikipedia article.

AvHerald now has a picture of the damaged fan. Not_Karl: ***2) Ban all CFM-56 turbine engines?*** Not_ Fixed as much as asked. AvieHeraldie: EASA had released Airworthiness Directive 2018-0071 dated Mar 26th 2018 and effective Apr 2nd 2018 reasoning: "An occurrence was reported of fan blade failure...

1) Ban all aeroplanies.
2) Ban all turbine engines.
3) Ban the French from the aeroplanie industry.
4) Ban ancientliners designed 60 years ago.
5) Ban Southwest.

AvieHeraldie.

Welcome back!

That's not a Boeing.

How can you be sure that it is not a Boeing disguised as an Aircheapcompositecrackerboxbus?

Could some spare 380 engines work? Oh wait, they have been known to do nasty things to composite wing struts...

Fixed.
Ban cheap-composite fan blades!

Can, unless your donkey is named Horse.
Per

No, it's a donkey with no name.

Gabe, there:

And no, the pilot with a concealed gun or a bomb transported in the cargo hold don't qualify either.

(as a warbird)
What if the pilot drops toilet paper rolls?

...and don't say horse.

Can we still say "donkey"?

Maybe Per thought this Lirica-200 class ship would have the same kind of automation than the Lirica-236A class and crashed by using perfect ship's wheel-and-rudder helmsmanship.
That said, meteor involvement should Not_be discarded.

I see much foreground clutter AND background clutter (trucks and fences) All those flags on the underside are underexposed. The whole thing needs to be sharpened and cleaned up dust spots. And in the realm of the PUREST of opinions (not based on any fact at all)...the S-duct is too severe and too f...

Did they died?
Any meteors involved?

Not_noteworthy, we all know that Boeings can make vertical take-offs.

Sorry, if I posted something there,

Consider me offended.

I am not allowed to post it here too.

I authorize you.

Gabriel, are you back to posting the same stuff all over the place or what?

If it's worth it, yes. I mean, if you are ok with that, of course,

It's not worth it.

It is.

Or have a bird in a cage.

Only if it is allowed as a comfort animal.

as Not_Karl likes to day, "Ban all airplanes". INDEED . (...) see if someone suggests a bold, eye-rolling modification to aerospace safety methods. Instead of banning all aeroplanies, we could just ban those with enclosed, pressurized, bleed-air chemtrailed/fire-prone electrically pumped cabins. Lo...

Mr. Snappy is your friend

no

Should all helicopteries have ejectable rotors and ballistic parachutes ? Should I make crude drawings of this and present them there as a revolutionary idea to make Not_fixed-wing-aviation safer ? (I'm missing that kind of posts...) Yes, you should. The question is... will you? Of course Not _ :P ...

Could you please bring your photographic expertise here? Thanks in advance.

Should all helicopteries have ejectable rotors and ballistic parachutes? Should I make crude drawings of this and present them there as a revolutionary idea to make Not_fixed-wing-aviation safer? (I'm missing that kind of posts...)

Were there written procedures for this or is it cowboy improvisation? Should we ask for opinion there?