Nuances: You choose to gloss over my inclusion of the word basically. It’s a gray concept that you and Evan struggle with, but kind of key nuance to this concept. Ocelot did say wing drop. Acknowledged, she (as long as we’re claiming nuances), did not_say spin. But again Evan, you stall a plane, an...

That is a stall. (Spare me the nuances). Ok, that is ONE description of a stall. I'll go even further and say that that's the most common description of a stall. In that sense, I agree that one wing can "stall" before the other. But I will also say that (sorry if this a nuance), even with...

I want to be clear: You are “taking this back”? Momentarily. Until I understand the "nuances" in Ocelot's thoughts. A stall is a rather sharp, significant loss of lift, caused by the sudden separation of smooth airflow across the top of the wing around the magical 16-degree +/- angle of a...

There is no secret I am trying to hide here. And actually I wrote and deleted a response (by the magic of deleting your comment BEFORE submitting). This was the exchange Ocelot: Doesn't seem entirely consistent with stalling one wing. Gabe: "stalling one wing" almost never happens. Ocelot:...

Local media has an article * saying five flights reached supersonic speeds ... And that passengers didn't notice a big difference in the cabin , apart from arriving early at their destinations... :roll: Maybe them going quite faster than normal but not_reaching supersonic speeds has something to do...

His only point was not use it as an "on demand" tool to correct a screwed-up too-high approach that was not planned like that, unless you cannot go around which would be the preferred option to fix that. I am not sure I 100% agree with that, but that's a different discussion. Real life is...

Maybe it’s arguably correct, conversely it’s a useful tool that maybe ought to be practiced occasionally so it can be used when needed. Why "conversely"? That is EXACTLY what he is saying. So if he is correct, THEN it IS a useful tool that must be practiced regularly by nothing less than ...

What else would produce this behavior?

Shimmy?

Dropping a wing because you stall one side first does happen.

Dropping a wing is a stall-related situation does happen... a lot.
That doesn't mean that one wing is stalled and the other is not.

…and we certainly don’t want to miss this:
IMG_0523.jpeg

We [no italics] didn't.

...DK_Editsies...

Are we enjoying their AvieHeraldie re-writings?

No

Not what I had in mind...

Did you try carrito de rulemanes?

The court was unreasonable and should have favored Air Canada's position. I told my boss that the mistake in my email where I said "to rise concerns" instead of "to raise concerns" was not my fault because that's what an AI thing said, not me. He said "ok" (or did he ju...

Laugh all you want, but I feel very identified... I'm 1,91m (~6.8 American Handeggs) , and have vast, verifiable experience with spaces designed for people Not_taller than 1,75m (~2 baseball bats) .... but Not _with aeroplanies as I value my life :D Ok you are very tall! Almost as tall as me (1.93m).

...first results... Be grateful you didn't get a full page of sponsored results , a bazillion useless websites offering " solutions " for the problem you googled but actually only giving the most obvious and useless tips while trying to sell you a product , outright scams , etc. Remember ...

FCOM.

Effin' crappers overflowing manual?

No. That would be the ECOM.

(psst, frigging would work)

Me too

You woke feminist Karen. Never say "Me too". Say "So did I" instead.

But hey, Taylor Swift’s boyfriend won some FOOTBALL game, and that’s what really matters, right?

To most, yes

(and no, I am not going into the football vs handegg discussion)

Speaking of AI... Real world case: I searched the interwebs for "is it "rise concerns" or "raise concerns". One of the first results was a page that quotes sentences where your phrase was used, and at the top of that page there is an AI takeaway which read like this: 'rise ...

"Mummified monkey heads" is the name of my postmodern punk band.

I don't know why I initially read postmortem, and it made sense.

An unidentified person in one of the cars on I-75 was seriously injured, according to the FAA.

I concede that ‘serious’ is a broad term that does not necessarily equal life-threatening.

That's still worse than what I thought. I thought there had been only minor injuries on the ground.

***they only hit 2 vehicles (and so far no one on the ground has did died.)***

Fixed.

Why "so far"? Any severe injuries?

Ugly but nice!
What AI engine (or whatever it is called) are you using?

I turned on Dan Juan . He reviewed much. My takeaway was and live ATC: 5 miles out, everything seemed fine. A minute later, “we’re landing on the interstate”. Strange deal. And they did not run out of fuel. In any case, until we know more, these pilots are provisionally heroes in my mind. They real...