With you as far as I have ever read is not offical phraseology. It wouldn't be in my "books" since we have the ATC side of things, but as a pilot myself I'm pretty sure I say it quite often. It's not officially discouraged to us, since we do not say it, and it's not our job to be slapping ...

It's good to see you too Shadey

ATCBob, a further question for you how does the conflict alert work at your workstation? Does every workstation have it? Up here we do, although same as you it does not provide much effect... climbing someone underneath someone else will quite often set it off even though separation was never affect...

I'm not sure what peole expect the FAA to say in this case? The Controller will be fired? No, unfortunately controllers make mistakes, even though the consequences of such mistakes can be quite grave, the fact is controllers are humans. The responsibility of an instructor is a great one, often for l...

No I don't. I do understand that that is a standard check in and do understand that the controller needs to know altitude and heading. What I do not understand is that with computer data-blocks and encoding altimiters, etc. is the verbal repeating of altitude/heading is truly of value, and if you t...

I just wanted to say thank you, the site looks great, I really like the forum layout and features.

Most of all I appreciate you putting the time and money into it. I hope your own personal finances are not being affected, if so I'd be glad to donate something to help out.

Cheers.

Specifically you must say flight level, one of the big reasons is what happens in the following situation: Air Canada 123 is handed off at 34,000 assigned a heading of 330? "Air Canada 123, with you 340 heading 330" Get my point? ;) Regarding "With you" It's not proper phraseolog...

It's good to be back! Missed all of you clowns


Glad to see the most important part of aviation has been represented with its own forum as well!

Multiman = Vectorforfood ???

That is correct.

Multiman died with AD.com