F.A.O.: 3WE
Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2014 4:32 am
yesMethinks you come from a lonely, but mature alternate universe. I read this post and link and for some reason feel the need to say the word Indeed. (in bold font).
yesMethinks you come from a lonely, but mature alternate universe. I read this post and link and for some reason feel the need to say the word Indeed. (in bold font).
Oh, absolutely not! Maybe this accident should have its own thread in this forum.Is it wrong to discuss the G-4 over run?
Is that the JP's politically correct term for perverts?I feel safer knowing that security runs off weird folks at the fence.
I would welcome them back in, as Admin. Send out the word.Oh, absolutely not! Maybe this accident should have its own thread in this forum.Is it wrong to discuss the G-4 over run?
Our forum.
I really don't feel comfortable in a forum where several of our top forumites are banned .
What I mean is they are banned in the "certain other forum" (JP ), not here ("our forum" ).I would welcome them back in, as Admin. Send out the word.Oh, absolutely not! Maybe this accident should have its own thread in this forum.Is it wrong to discuss the G-4 over run?
Our forum.
I really don't feel comfortable in a forum where several of our top forumites are banned .
You know, the vast majority of folks do not blindly and relentlessly pull pack, just the occasional regional guy and Frenchman. Still it's quite shocking to consider.I was going to commend your basic roadmanship for not "relentlessly pull back on the wheel", but maybe it was simply because the wheel shaker/pusher did not activate .
there an urban myth somewhere that an ag pilot/cropduster put his car through a fence and filled in his insurance claim that his natural reaction on seeing a fence starting to fill up his window was to pullback but nothing happend ...You know, the vast majority of folks do not blindly and relentlessly pull pack, just the occasional regional guy and Frenchman. Still it's quite shocking to consider.I was going to commend your basic roadmanship for not "relentlessly pull back on the wheel", but maybe it was simply because the wheel shaker/pusher did not activate .
Oh please, we're all on there under different names.I really don't feel comfortable in a forum where several of our top forumites are banned .
That's good news . But I'm still a little bit offended by the word "BANNED" below some nicknames...Oh please, we're all on there under different names.I really don't feel comfortable in a forum where several of our top forumites are banned .
Really? I mostly find it just comical that they think they can really stop any of us. Of course, I also found it comical when the dearly departed, much-lamented and missed Saint Donald The Mighty and Righteous Wrench would ban me time and again on orders of Amy the Thong. I would just re-register.That's good news . But I'm still a little bit offended by the word "BANNED" below some nicknames...
I like your spirit .Really? I mostly find it just comical that they think they can really stop any of us.
Fixed.Differences:
MH17 here: 1 page, 13 posts, normal discussion.
MH17 "there": 20 pages, 388 posts, conspiracies (but not as much as with MH370), a permanently banned user and a thread locked by a moderator who doesn't know who Len Morgan, Gordon Baxter, Richard Collins, and Dick Not_Karl are (even though they aren't Journalists).
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
"All New Name That Aircraft - July 2009"
An obscure, nice, old planey thing (which I immediately identified with my Unbelievable Universal Knowledge of Everything... Or maybe with Google Image Search, can't remember). The user who posted it says "The name of the aircraft is a species of animal.". No replies involving flying donkeys or squid .
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Our beloved Horscht is relatively active lately... (Like two posts in the last couple of months ) - Intriguing.
Well, now MH370 has a permanent ban of its own. I predict an in-forum structural thread-lock within eighteen days.Differences:
MH17 here: 1 page, 13 posts, normal discussion.
MH17 "there": 20 pages, 388 posts, conspiracies (but not as much as with MH370), a permanently banned user and a locked thread.
Will search for it, thanks.It is a great read though and worth searching out.
Fixed.I was a bit rough on Brian for him not knowing any obscure Flying journal.... Errr.... Typists
CONCUR .and he started editing my stuff.....
Not cool.
http://forums.jetphotos.net/showthread. ... 622&page=3 Post 42Will search for it, thanks.It is a great read though and worth searching out.
Thanks.Fixed.I was a bit rough on Brian for him not knowing any obscure Flying journal.... Errr.... Typists
You can edit (and fix) my stuff any time.CONCUR .and he started editing my stuff.....
Not cool.
Thanks. Now I remember reading it back in the day, great stuff indeed. I didn't remember the enlightening information on RAT availability.http://forums.jetphotos.net/showthread. ... 622&page=3 Post 42
You're welcome (heck the whole thread is beautiful)
You can edit (and fix) my stuff any time.