Page 12 of 43

Re: F.A.O.: 3WE

Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2016 5:20 pm
by Ancient Mariner
there's something special about that purple.
CONCUR.
Don't like flying bananas, or dildos.
Why do you have an user there, then? :?
Add three grandchildren to the mix and woohooooooo. :shock:
I hope you can procure enough strong beverages to cope with the situation :shock: .
I ham whorkin vry ha..ha..hard on dat.
Sckåååll.
Pher or shomethink

Re: F.A.O.: 3WE

Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2016 10:09 pm
by 3WE
Did you drunked?

Re: F.A.O.: 3WE

Posted: Tue Jul 26, 2016 11:37 pm
by Not_Karl
I hope you do not mind my new signature over there:
Untitled-1.png
Untitled-1.png (64.3 KiB) Viewed 6432 times

Re: F.A.O.: 3WE

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2016 4:18 pm
by 3WE
I hope you do not mind my new signature over there...
Works for me...especially considering that he has concurdeded a couple of times on my photography advice.

Re: F.A.O.: 3WE

Posted: Thu Jul 28, 2016 3:16 am
by 3WE
I hope you do not mind my new signature over there...
Works for me...especially considering that he has concurdeded a couple of times on my photography advice.
Oh my...I just read the post. Brill-yunt!

However, should TeeVee, Boeingee Bobbieeee, LSD-744LHB, and that SOB ATLAirbusworshippercrew, have commentage?

Re: F.A.O.: 3WE

Posted: Thu Jul 28, 2016 12:05 pm
by elaw
Oh my...I just read the post. Brill-yunt!
Concur!

However several very important things are overlooked:
1. Parachutes are made of cheap composites.
2. Parachutes are not equipped with sophisticated fall-by-wire systems to save the day when the operator pulls relentlessly on something.
3. (In light of recent events...) Parachutes are flammable.

Therefore most likely you are going to died anyway. :twisted:

Re: F.A.O.: 3WE

Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 1:57 pm
by Ancient Mariner
Oh my...I just read the post. Brill-yunt!
Concur!

However several very important things are overlooked:
1. Parachutes are made of cheap composites.
2. Parachutes are not equipped with sophisticated fall-by-wire systems to save the day when the operator pulls relentlessly on something.
3. (In light of recent events...) Parachutes are flammable.

Therefore most likely you are going to died anyway. :twisted:

What :shock:
You mean that Parachutes are not safe? And I just sent three of my grandkids parasailing, together at the same time, in Croatia.
No wonder they screamed.
Per

Re: F.A.O.: 3WE

Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 2:47 pm
by elaw
Three at once? You're not supposed to do that... that's why it's called pairasailing! BWAHAHAHAHAHA.

Interesting fact: my wife and I went to Aruba a couple of months ago and they do a lot of parasailing. A boatload of it, you might say. 8-)

But the interesting thing is it's so windy, they generally don't have the boat moving when they do it! They load the boat up with people, go a few hundred yards off shore, anchor the boat, then let the people out on the 'chute one or two (or three) at a time.

Re: F.A.O.: 3WE

Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 3:17 pm
by flyboy2548m
Three at once? You're not supposed to do that... that's why it's called pairasailing! BWAHAHAHAHAHA.

Interesting fact: my wife and I went to Aruba a couple of months ago and they do a lot of parasailing. A boatload of it, you might say. 8-)

But the interesting thing is it's so windy, they generally don't have the boat moving when they do it! They load the boat up with people, go a few hundred yards off shore, anchor the boat, then let the people out on the 'chute one or two (or three) at a time.
AUA is a cool approach.

Re: F.A.O.: 3WE

Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 7:08 pm
by Ancient Mariner
Three at once? You're not supposed to do that... that's why it's called pairasailing! BWAHAHAHAHAHA.

Interesting fact: my wife and I went to Aruba a couple of months ago and they do a lot of parasailing. A boatload of it, you might say. 8-)

But the interesting thing is it's so windy, they generally don't have the boat moving when they do it! They load the boat up with people, go a few hundred yards off shore, anchor the boat, then let the people out on the 'chute one or two (or three) at a time.
AUA is a cool approach.
It is also a cool destination, or was.....when I was 16 years old. Like 100 years ago, when I could drink, and f*** all night..
Per

Re: F.A.O.: 3WE

Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 7:09 pm
by Ancient Mariner
I did not write f***, I wrote f***.
Per

Re: F.A.O.: 3WE

Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 7:10 pm
by Ancient Mariner
Well, f*** it then.
Per

Re: F.A.O.: 3WE

Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 11:26 pm
by Not_Karl
However, should TeeVee, Boeingee Bobbieeee, LSD-744LHB, and that SOB ATLAirbusworshippercrew, have commentage?
TeeVee would offer to represent the rest of the passengers and their families and sue the coffee maker's supplier, the pilot's estate, Boeing, the Airline, Not_Karl and all of their mums. LH-B744 would trace parallels with Germanwings 9525 and Swissair 111, comment on how many years have passed since the last similar incident in Europe (excluding Germanwings) and how many years of safe service "his nickname" has provided (at JP.net forums, as he obviously wouldn't be in the doomed flight since it is not_a Lufthansa and not_a 747-400); BieBie is implied in ATLCrewie's speech; ATLAirbusFlyAltarBoy did commentaged.
1. Parachutes are made of cheap composites.
2. Parachutes are not equipped with sophisticated fall-by-wire systems to save the day when the operator pulls relentlessly on something.
3. (In light of recent events...) Parachutes are flammable.

Therefore most likely you are going to died anyway. :twisted:
Having screwed other people, I can did died happily :mrgreen: .
Parachutes at least don't have Li-Ion batteries... I hope :o .
It is also a cool destination, or was.....when I was 16 years old. Like 100 years ago, when I could drink, and f*** all night..
Per
Yeah, I also used to drink and fart all night when I was young. No need to censor it... :mrgreen:

Re: F.A.O.: 3WE

Posted: Sat Jul 30, 2016 1:28 am
by 3WE
However, should TeeVee, Boeingee Bobbieeee, LSD-744LHB, and that SOB ATLAirbusworshippercrew, have commentage?
TeeVee... Not_Karl...LH-B744... BieBie... ATLCrewie...ATLAirbusFlyAltarBoy......elaw...Ancient Mariner...Per
Glad to see your reply. I was wondering if your JetPicture discussion thread was a metaphor for you resigning from this (or that) aviation forum.

We are relieved.

Re: F.A.O.: 3WE

Posted: Sat Jul 30, 2016 2:10 am
by Not_Karl
Glad to see your reply. I was wondering if your JetPicture discussion thread was a metaphor for you resigning from this (or that) aviation forum.

We are relieved.
Thanks for your concern, but I would never, NEVER deprive this forum of my magnificence. Well, maybe if I did died...
And there... I would need to actually post there to be able to resign! :mrgreen:

Re: F.A.O.: 3WE

Posted: Sat Jul 30, 2016 9:05 am
by Not_Karl
It appears that Delta has experienced a total air disaster.
No fatalities. No injuries. In fact, no crash. But a disaster nonetheless.

Re: F.A.O.: 3WE

Posted: Sat Jul 30, 2016 11:22 am
by 3WE
It appears that Delta has experienced a total air disaster.
No fatalities. No injuries. In fact, no crash. But a disaster nonetheless.
Indeed.

Along with 7 actual crashes.

Sounds like Alex-Snot-This! may have a no-fly list.

Re: F.A.O.: 3WE

Posted: Sat Jul 30, 2016 5:06 pm
by flyboy2548m
It appears that Delta has experienced a total air disaster.
No fatalities. No injuries. In fact, no crash. But a disaster nonetheless.
I'm trying to figure out why someone would email customer service rather than ops safety on this.

Re: F.A.O.: 3WE

Posted: Sat Jul 30, 2016 7:13 pm
by 3WE
It appears that Delta has experienced a total air disaster.
No fatalities. No injuries. In fact, no crash. But a disaster nonetheless.
I'm trying to figure out why someone would email customer service rather than ops safety on this.
Well duh!...Not everyone is as smart as "we" are.

Re: F.A.O.: 3WE

Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2016 6:16 am
by Not_Karl
It appears that Delta has experienced a total air disaster.
No fatalities. No injuries. In fact, no crash. But a disaster nonetheless.
I'm trying to figure out why someone would email customer service rather than ops safety on this.
Because "ops safety" doesn't grant refunds or compensations? :mrgreen:
(Actually I don't blame her for that, I didn't know of "ops safety" before you mentioned it and would have contacted customer service like she did if I felt the need for any... official explanation)

In any case, this incident is a good reminder of the inherent risks of descending.

Re: F.A.O.: 3WE

Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2016 1:06 pm
by 3WE
I also think that good forums have more than one...

Re: F.A.O.: 3WE

Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2016 4:47 pm
by flyboy2548m
I also think that good forums have more than one...
All we gotta do now is find a good forum.

Re: F.A.O.: 3WE

Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2016 2:24 am
by Not_Karl
Gabriel, I dare you to try your "I broke the plane" joke nowadays :mrgreen: .
All we gotta do now is find a good forum.
So we can ruin it? :D
British wannabe jetphotos king
:shock:

Re: F.A.O.: 3WE

Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2016 6:23 pm
by Not_Karl
I seem to recall a post from Brianie (I think) recommending to use the "block" option against LH-B744, but then it vanished...
I do agree with Evan
:shock: :o :shock: :o :shock: :o :shock: :o :shock: :o

Re: F.A.O.: 3WE

Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2016 8:18 pm
by 3WE
I do agree with Evan...

"...at least to a certain extent..."


He recently expressed that he might use a known, fat, dumb, and happy power and pitch setting if UAS occurred and the required 4 minutes had passed...

...no worries.