Death of the American Space Program

Politics is continually a popular topic of conversation at AD.info, and to allow our members to discuss it, we've created this forum.

Moderators: FrankM, el

PurduePilot
Posts: 2130
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 2:02 am

Death of the American Space Program

Postby PurduePilot » Fri Apr 16, 2010 4:01 am

Open letter from Armstrong, Lovell, and Cernan to President Obama.

http://www.fastcompany.com/1616120/nasa ... ell-cernan
The United States entered into the challenge of space exploration under President Eisenhower’s first term, however, it was the Soviet Union who excelled in those early years. Under the bold vision of Presidents Kennedy, Johnson, and Nixon, and with the overwhelming approval of the American people, we rapidly closed the gap in the final third; of the 20th century, and became the world leader in space exploration.

America’s space accomplishments earned the respect and admiration of the world. Science probes were unlocking the secrets of the cosmos; space technology was providing instantaneous worldwide communication; orbital sentinels were helping man understand the vagaries of nature. Above all else, the people around the world were inspired by the human exploration of space and the expanding of man’s frontier. It suggested that what had been thought to be impossible was now within reach. Students were inspired to prepare themselves to be a part of this new age. No government program in modern history has been so effective in motivating the young to do “what has never been done before.”

World leadership in space was not achieved easily. In the first half-century of the space age, our country made a significant financial investment, thousands of Americans dedicated themselves to the effort, and some gave their lives to achieve the dream of a nation. In the latter part of the first half century of the space age, Americans and their international partners focused primarily on exploiting the near frontiers of space with the Space Shuttle and the International Space Station.

As a result of the tragic loss of the Space Shuttle Columbia in 2003, it was concluded that our space policy required a new strategic vision. Extensive studies and analysis led to this new mandate: meet our existing commitments, return to our exploration roots, return to the moon, and prepare to venture further outward to the asteroids and to Mars. The program was named “Constellation.” In the ensuing years, this plan was endorsed by two Presidents of different parties and approved by both Democratic and Republican congresses.

The Columbia Accident Board had given NASA a number of recommendations fundamental to the Constellation architecture which were duly incorporated. The Ares rocket family was patterned after the Von Braun Modular concept so essential to the success of the Saturn 1B and the Saturn 5. A number of components in the Ares 1 rocket would become the foundation of the very large heavy lift Ares V, thus reducing the total development costs substantially. After the Ares 1 becomes operational, the only major new components necessary for the Ares V would be the larger propellant tanks to support the heavy lift requirements.

The design and the production of the flight components and infrastructure to implement this vision was well underway. Detailed planning of all the major sectors of the program had begun. Enthusiasm within NASA and throughout the country was very high.

When President Obama recently released his budget for NASA, he proposed a slight increase in total funding, substantial research and technology development, an extension of the International Space Station operation until 2020, long range planning for a new but undefined heavy lift rocket and significant funding for the development of commercial access to low earth orbit.

Although some of these proposals have merit, the accompanying decision to cancel the Constellation program, its Ares 1 and Ares V rockets, and the Orion spacecraft, is devastating.

America’s only path to low Earth orbit and the International Space Station will now be subject to an agreement with Russia to purchase space on their Soyuz (at a price of over 50 million dollars per seat with significant increases expected in the near future) until we have the capacity to provide transportation for ourselves. The availability of a commercial transport to orbit as envisioned in the President’s proposal cannot be predicted with any certainty, but is likely to take substantially longer and be more expensive than we would hope.

It appears that we will have wasted our current $10-plus billion investment in Constellation and, equally importantly, we will have lost the many years required to recreate the equivalent of what we will have discarded.

For The United States, the leading space faring nation for nearly half a century, to be without carriage to low Earth orbit and with no human exploration capability to go beyond Earth orbit for an indeterminate time into the future, destines our nation to become one of second or even third rate stature. While the President’s plan envisages humans traveling away from Earth and perhaps toward Mars at some time in the future, the lack of developed rockets and spacecraft will assure that ability will not be available for many years.

Without the skill and experience that actual spacecraft operation provides, the USA is far too likely to be on a long downhill slide to mediocrity. America must decide if it wishes to remain a leader in space. If it does, we should institute a program which will give us the very best chance of achieving that goal.



Neil Armstrong

Commander, Apollo 11

James Lovell

Commander, Apollo 13

Eugene Cernan

Commander, Apollo 17

OldSowBreath
Posts: 1420
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2008 6:16 pm

Re: Death of the American Space Program

Postby OldSowBreath » Fri Apr 16, 2010 4:49 pm

Neither obama or any of his advisers will read it, and on the off chance they do, in their impenetrable stupidity they will smuggly ignore it.

User avatar
Sickbag
Posts: 2969
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 2:10 pm
Location: Spine-fuhrer of Hoboken

Re: Death of the American Space Program

Postby Sickbag » Fri Apr 16, 2010 5:18 pm

In this age of Photoshop I would of thought that faking the moon landings again wouldn't cost too much.
2022: The year of the Squid Singularity

PurduePilot
Posts: 2130
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 2:02 am

Re: Death of the American Space Program

Postby PurduePilot » Fri Apr 16, 2010 10:12 pm

In this age of Photoshop I would of thought that faking the moon landings again wouldn't cost too much.
Are we really going to have this discussion?

User avatar
flyboy2548m
Posts: 4392
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 12:32 am
Location: Ormond Beach, FL

Re: Death of the American Space Program

Postby flyboy2548m » Sat Apr 17, 2010 2:08 am

I think the whole issue of whether the lunar landings were real or not is pretty much immaterial. Either way, that was then and this is now. And the reality of the now is that nobody seems to have either the means or much of a desire to do anything like that again.
"Lav sinks on 737 Max are too small"

-TeeVee, one of America's finest legal minds.

Marc 1
Posts: 432
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 2:24 pm

Re: Death of the American Space Program

Postby Marc 1 » Sun Apr 18, 2010 2:48 am

I think the whole issue of whether the lunar landings were real or not is pretty much immaterial. Either way, that was then and this is now. And the reality of the now is that nobody seems to have either the means or much of a desire to do anything like that again.
Sadly, I think people would be more impressed with the lastest release of Avatar 3 or the next PS3 "Need for Speed" itteration than a manned landing on Mars.

PurduePilot
Posts: 2130
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 2:02 am

Re: Death of the American Space Program

Postby PurduePilot » Sun Apr 18, 2010 5:42 am

I think the whole issue of whether the lunar landings were real or not is pretty much immaterial. Either way, that was then and this is now. And the reality of the now is that nobody seems to have either the means or much of a desire to do anything like that again.
Sadly, I think people would be more impressed with the lastest release of Avatar 3 or the next PS3 "Need for Speed" itteration than a manned landing on Mars.
I didn't realize Avatar 2 had come out.

Marc 1
Posts: 432
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 2:24 pm

Re: Death of the American Space Program

Postby Marc 1 » Sun Apr 18, 2010 8:58 am

I think the whole issue of whether the lunar landings were real or not is pretty much immaterial. Either way, that was then and this is now. And the reality of the now is that nobody seems to have either the means or much of a desire to do anything like that again.
Sadly, I think people would be more impressed with the lastest release of Avatar 3 or the next PS3 "Need for Speed" itteration than a manned landing on Mars.
I didn't realize Avatar 2 had come out.
I have young children, I have no social life. The last movie I went out to see was I dunno, The Dirty Dozen?

PurduePilot
Posts: 2130
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 2:02 am

Re: Death of the American Space Program

Postby PurduePilot » Mon Apr 19, 2010 4:26 am


I have young children, I have no social life. The last movie I went out to see was I dunno, The Dirty Dozen?
Then they can't be that young.

User avatar
3WE
Posts: 8220
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 2:37 pm
Location: Flyover, America

Re: Death of the American Space Program

Postby 3WE » Fri Apr 23, 2010 1:15 am

I think the whole issue of whether the lunar landings were real or not is pretty much immaterial. Either way, that was then and this is now. And the reality of the now is that nobody seems to have either the means or much of a desire to do anything like that again.
Unfortunately rockets and engineers have gotten a lot more expensive, while the moon is still a very dead, inert rock.

And, don't get me wrong- silicone bathtub caulk is still some really good stuff.
Commercial Pilot, Vandelay Industries, Inc., Plant Nutrient Division.

User avatar
Sickbag
Posts: 2969
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 2:10 pm
Location: Spine-fuhrer of Hoboken

Re: Death of the American Space Program

Postby Sickbag » Fri Apr 23, 2010 7:44 am

meanwhile the US militarisation of space continues apace...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/8601172.stm
2022: The year of the Squid Singularity

Marc 1
Posts: 432
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 2:24 pm

Re: Death of the American Space Program

Postby Marc 1 » Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:30 am

meanwhile the US militarisation of space continues apace...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/8601172.stm

Tell you what, I'll show my righteous indignation too - right after you convince the Chinese to stop their militarisation of space.

User avatar
Sickbag
Posts: 2969
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 2:10 pm
Location: Spine-fuhrer of Hoboken

Re: Death of the American Space Program

Postby Sickbag » Sun Apr 25, 2010 12:02 pm

meanwhile the US militarisation of space continues apace...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/8601172.stm

Tell you what, I'll show my righteous indignation too - right after you convince the Chinese to stop their militarisation of space.
A letter is in the post.
2022: The year of the Squid Singularity


Return to “Political Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests