Slam Dunk Descent Rates
Moderators: el, ZeroAltitude, flyboy2548m
Slam Dunk Descent Rates
A general question about airliner abilities to descend.
Ok, you are on a downwind at 10,000 feet AGL, "opposite your touchdown point and have virtually nothing between you and landing.
(It's a little unusual, but you guys have told stories of stuff like this actually happening from time to time).
So, can you "completely" cut power (typically) or do you need to carry some power for pressurization / whatever.
What kind of descent rate can you achieve (clean). (Just a rough range)
What kind of descent rate can you acheive with flaps, spoilers. (Just a rough range).
Or does it really all come down to comfort? (And what range of descent rate is that?)
Ok, you are on a downwind at 10,000 feet AGL, "opposite your touchdown point and have virtually nothing between you and landing.
(It's a little unusual, but you guys have told stories of stuff like this actually happening from time to time).
So, can you "completely" cut power (typically) or do you need to carry some power for pressurization / whatever.
What kind of descent rate can you achieve (clean). (Just a rough range)
What kind of descent rate can you acheive with flaps, spoilers. (Just a rough range).
Or does it really all come down to comfort? (And what range of descent rate is that?)
Commercial Pilot, Vandelay Industries, Inc., Plant Nutrient Division.
- flyboy2548m
- Posts: 4395
- Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 12:32 am
- Location: Ormond Beach, FL
Re: Slam Dunk Descent Rates
I'll give you a general answer, since the question you asked is pretty general even for you: airliners can descend very quickly, if necessary. As for comfort, most pax can't really tell the difference between 3,000fpm or 6,000fpm. Heck, without looking at the gauges, even I can barely tell the difference.
Hope this helps.
Hope this helps.
"Lav sinks on 737 Max are too small"
-TeeVee, one of America's finest legal minds.
-TeeVee, one of America's finest legal minds.
Re: Slam Dunk Descent Rates
Bet you could at 2000ft...can't really tell the difference between 3,000fpm or 6,000fpm. Heck, without looking at the gauges, even I can barely tell the difference
Re: Slam Dunk Descent Rates
There's a rule of thumb- for a gentle level off, start at 10% of your vertical speed in fpm.Bet you could at 2000ft...can't really tell the difference between 3,000fpm or 6,000fpm. Heck, without looking at the gauges, even I can barely tell the difference
I don't know if it holds up at 6000 fpm descent rates, but if you start leveling at 2000, you will be done at 1300 and the customers would only feel several seconds of a slowing elevator.
Commercial Pilot, Vandelay Industries, Inc., Plant Nutrient Division.
-
- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 2:02 am
Re: Slam Dunk Descent Rates
Question of the day: 2000 minus 10% of 6000 equals how many feets?There's a rule of thumb- for a gentle level off, start at 10% of your vertical speed in fpm.Bet you could at 2000ft...can't really tell the difference between 3,000fpm or 6,000fpm. Heck, without looking at the gauges, even I can barely tell the difference
I don't know if it holds up at 6000 fpm descent rates, but if you start leveling at 2000, you will be done at 1300 and the customers would only feel several seconds of a slowing elevator.
- flyboy2548m
- Posts: 4395
- Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 12:32 am
- Location: Ormond Beach, FL
Re: Slam Dunk Descent Rates
Uh...1400?Question of the day: 2000 minus 10% of 6000 equals how many feets?
There's a rule of thumb- for a gentle level off, start at 10% of your vertical speed in fpm.
I don't know if it holds up at 6000 fpm descent rates, but if you start leveling at 2000, you will be done at 1300 and the customers would only feel several seconds of a slowing elevator.
"Lav sinks on 737 Max are too small"
-TeeVee, one of America's finest legal minds.
-TeeVee, one of America's finest legal minds.
-
- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 2:02 am
Re: Slam Dunk Descent Rates
Good job.Uh...1400?Question of the day: 2000 minus 10% of 6000 equals how many feets?
There's a rule of thumb- for a gentle level off, start at 10% of your vertical speed in fpm.
I don't know if it holds up at 6000 fpm descent rates, but if you start leveling at 2000, you will be done at 1300 and the customers would only feel several seconds of a slowing elevator.
Re: Slam Dunk Descent Rates
Doesn't every level off start at 100% of your vertical speed?There's a rule of thumb- for a gentle level off, start at 10% of your vertical speed in fpm.Bet you could at 2000ft...can't really tell the difference between 3,000fpm or 6,000fpm. Heck, without looking at the gauges, even I can barely tell the difference
I don't know if it holds up at 6000 fpm descent rates, but if you start leveling at 2000, you will be done at 1300 and the customers would only feel several seconds of a slowing elevator.
- flyboy2548m
- Posts: 4395
- Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 12:32 am
- Location: Ormond Beach, FL
Re: Slam Dunk Descent Rates
Don't worry, Andy, 3BS is just posting whatever Gabriel sends him.Doesn't every level off start at 100% of your vertical speed?
"Lav sinks on 737 Max are too small"
-TeeVee, one of America's finest legal minds.
-TeeVee, one of America's finest legal minds.
-
- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 2:02 am
Re: Slam Dunk Descent Rates
I think what he means is take 10% of your vertical speed and begin your level-off that much before reaching the desired altitude. If you're climbing at 3000fpm to 10000 feet, 10% of 3000 is 300 so you'll want to start leveling off at 9700 feet.Doesn't every level off start at 100% of your vertical speed?[There's a rule of thumb- for a gentle level off, start at 10% of your vertical speed in fpm.
I don't know if it holds up at 6000 fpm descent rates, but if you start leveling at 2000, you will be done at 1300 and the customers would only feel several seconds of a slowing elevator.
Re: Slam Dunk Descent Rates
I know what he think he means, its just never what he says!I think what he means is take 10% of your vertical speed and begin your level-off that much before reaching the desired altitude. If you're climbing at 3000fpm to 10000 feet, 10% of 3000 is 300 so you'll want to start leveling off at 9700 feet.Doesn't every level off start at 100% of your vertical speed?[There's a rule of thumb- for a gentle level off, start at 10% of your vertical speed in fpm.
I don't know if it holds up at 6000 fpm descent rates, but if you start leveling at 2000, you will be done at 1300 and the customers would only feel several seconds of a slowing elevator.
- flyboy2548m
- Posts: 4395
- Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 12:32 am
- Location: Ormond Beach, FL
Re: Slam Dunk Descent Rates
Trying to arrest a 3000fpm climb rate in 300ft does not a gentle level-off make, trust me.I think what he means is take 10% of your vertical speed and begin your level-off that much before reaching the desired altitude. If you're climbing at 3000fpm to 10000 feet, 10% of 3000 is 300 so you'll want to start leveling off at 9700 feet.Doesn't every level off start at 100% of your vertical speed?[There's a rule of thumb- for a gentle level off, start at 10% of your vertical speed in fpm.
I don't know if it holds up at 6000 fpm descent rates, but if you start leveling at 2000, you will be done at 1300 and the customers would only feel several seconds of a slowing elevator.
"Lav sinks on 737 Max are too small"
-TeeVee, one of America's finest legal minds.
-TeeVee, one of America's finest legal minds.
-
- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 2:02 am
Re: Slam Dunk Descent Rates
You'd definitely feel it, but if you did it perfectly smoothly and evenly over those 300 feet then it'd only be about a 0.065g acceleration, which is not exactly extreme.Trying to arrest a 3000fpm climb rate in 300ft does not a gentle level-off make, trust me.
- flyboy2548m
- Posts: 4395
- Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 12:32 am
- Location: Ormond Beach, FL
Re: Slam Dunk Descent Rates
You break my heart, Bradley. Out of curiosity, when was the last time you piloted an airplane that could do much more than 1500fpm upward? And before you say it, save your 787 sim adventures for you college buddies.You'd definitely feel it, but if you did it perfectly smoothly and evenly over those 300 feet then it'd only be about a 0.065g acceleration, which is not exactly extreme.Trying to arrest a 3000fpm climb rate in 300ft does not a gentle level-off make, trust me.
"Lav sinks on 737 Max are too small"
-TeeVee, one of America's finest legal minds.
-TeeVee, one of America's finest legal minds.
-
- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 2:02 am
Re: Slam Dunk Descent Rates
Sorry, I didn't mean to brake your hart--I sometimes forget that you are emotionally fragile.You break my heart, Bradley. Out of curiosity, when was the last time you piloted an airplane that could do much more than 1500fpm upward? And before you say it, save your 787 sim adventures for you college buddies.You'd definitely feel it, but if you did it perfectly smoothly and evenly over those 300 feet then it'd only be about a 0.065g acceleration, which is not exactly extreme.Trying to arrest a 3000fpm climb rate in 300ft does not a gentle level-off make, trust me.
You wouldn't feel prolonged vertical acceleration in a sim, so I fail to see how that would be at all relevant in this discussion.
- flyboy2548m
- Posts: 4395
- Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 12:32 am
- Location: Ormond Beach, FL
Re: Slam Dunk Descent Rates
You're right. So, how about answering my question?You wouldn't feel prolonged vertical acceleration in a sim, so I fail to see how that would be at all relevant in this discussion.
"Lav sinks on 737 Max are too small"
-TeeVee, one of America's finest legal minds.
-TeeVee, one of America's finest legal minds.
-
- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 2:02 am
Re: Slam Dunk Descent Rates
Oh, sorry, I assumed you were being rhetorical. I did some dual in a Piper Navajo three years ago and in a Seneca about two years ago. Now tell me why I broke your heart?You're right. So, how about answering my question?You wouldn't feel prolonged vertical acceleration in a sim, so I fail to see how that would be at all relevant in this discussion.
- flyboy2548m
- Posts: 4395
- Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 12:32 am
- Location: Ormond Beach, FL
Re: Slam Dunk Descent Rates
Good for you, Bradley. Next time you go up in the Navajo, try to "perfectly smoothly" arrest a 3000fpm rate in 300'. Let me know how it goes.Oh, sorry, I assumed you were being rhetorical. I did some dual in a Piper Navajo three years ago and in a Seneca about two years ago. Now tell me why I broke your heart?
"Lav sinks on 737 Max are too small"
-TeeVee, one of America's finest legal minds.
-TeeVee, one of America's finest legal minds.
-
- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 2:02 am
Re: Slam Dunk Descent Rates
So you're implying that inferior airmanship negates simple physics? Simple physics, of course, being very easy to add simple errors to at these early hours of the day, since it's actually a 0.13g downward acceleration now that I think about it.Good for you, Bradley. Next time you go up in the Navajo, try to "perfectly smoothly" arrest a 3000fpm rate in 300'. Let me know how it goes.Oh, sorry, I assumed you were being rhetorical. I did some dual in a Piper Navajo three years ago and in a Seneca about two years ago. Now tell me why I broke your heart?
Are you saying that it's impossible to change your vertical speed at a nearly constant rate?
Last edited by PurduePilot on Tue Sep 14, 2010 6:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- flyboy2548m
- Posts: 4395
- Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 12:32 am
- Location: Ormond Beach, FL
Re: Slam Dunk Descent Rates
I'm just saying try it and get back to me. For the record, A/P on the CRJ when climbing at 3000fpm or more to 10,000' goes in the ALTS CAP mode (that's level-off mode to you) at just past 9,000'. So, good luck.So you're implying that inferior airmanship negates simple physics?
"Lav sinks on 737 Max are too small"
-TeeVee, one of America's finest legal minds.
-TeeVee, one of America's finest legal minds.
-
- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 2:02 am
Re: Slam Dunk Descent Rates
What are we arguing about again?I'm just saying try it and get back to me. For the record, A/P on the CRJ when climbing at 3000fpm or more to 10,000' goes in the ALTS CAP mode (that's level-off mode to you) at just past 9,000'. So, good luck.So you're implying that inferior airmanship negates simple physics?
- flyboy2548m
- Posts: 4395
- Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 12:32 am
- Location: Ormond Beach, FL
Re: Slam Dunk Descent Rates
You said a 3000fpm climb rate can be arrested perfectly smoothly within 300'. I said try it and report back. Hope that helps.What are we arguing about again?
"Lav sinks on 737 Max are too small"
-TeeVee, one of America's finest legal minds.
-TeeVee, one of America's finest legal minds.
-
- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 2:02 am
Re: Slam Dunk Descent Rates
I take "smooth" to mean "not jerky", and jerkiness is the third derivative of position with respect to time. Hope this helps.You said a 3000fpm climb rate can be arrested perfectly smoothly within 300'. I said try it and report back. Hope that helps.What are we arguing about again?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests