787 inflight structural breakup in 3....2....1....

An open discussion of aviation safety related issues.

Moderators: FrankM, el, Dmmoore

User avatar
Sickbag
Posts: 2969
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 2:10 pm
Location: Spine-fuhrer of Hoboken

Re: 787 inflight structural breakup in 3....2....1....

Postby Sickbag » Sat Jan 12, 2013 10:31 am

Counting from now or from the first time that you've said it... some eighteen months back.
Yes.
Yes.
2022: The year of the Squid Singularity

User avatar
Gabriel
Posts: 3699
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2008 2:55 am
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina

Re: 787 inflight structural breakup in 3....2....1....

Postby Gabriel » Sun Jan 13, 2013 1:09 am

Counting from now or from the first time that you've said it... some eighteen months back.
Yes.
Yes.
There's no interrogation mark in my post.

User avatar
Not_Karl
Previously banned for not socially distancing
Posts: 4192
Joined: Thu Nov 12, 2009 6:12 pm
Location: Bona Nitogena y otra gaso, Argentina

Re: 787 inflight structural breakup in 3....2....1....

Postby Not_Karl » Sun Jan 13, 2013 4:47 am

Counting from now or from the first time that you've said it... some eighteen months back?
There's no interrogation mark in my post.
Fixed. You're welcome.
International Ban ALL Aeroplanies Association, founder and president.

"I think, based on the types of aircraft listed, you're pretty much guaranteed a fiery death."
- Contemporary Poet flyboy2548m to a Foffie.

User avatar
Sickbag
Posts: 2969
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 2:10 pm
Location: Spine-fuhrer of Hoboken

Re: 787 inflight structural breakup in 3....2....1....

Postby Sickbag » Sun Jan 13, 2013 1:26 pm

There's no interrogation mark in my post.
Why not.
2022: The year of the Squid Singularity

User avatar
Gabriel
Posts: 3699
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2008 2:55 am
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina

Re: 787 inflight structural breakup in 3....2....1....

Postby Gabriel » Sun Jan 13, 2013 4:01 pm

There's no interrogation mark in my post.
Why not.
Exactly. That's the reason why not.

User avatar
Procede
Posts: 646
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 11:40 am

Re: 787 inflight structural breakup in 3....2....1....

Postby Procede » Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:59 am

When it's brown, it's done. When it's black, it's buggered:
NTSB releases picture of charred 787 battery box

User avatar
Ancient Mariner
Posts: 3774
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 5:24 pm

Re: 787 inflight structural breakup in 3....2....1....

Postby Ancient Mariner » Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:43 pm

When it's brown, it's done. When it's black, it's buggered:
NTSB releases picture of charred 787 battery box
I saw a picture ot the wiring in the electronics bay somewhere and couldn't believe my eyes. Total amateurs, crossed wires, dangling, unfastened wires, sharp bends...............all the no, nos in the book. If that was my shed which I'm building at the moment I would have been given day fines until corrected and no power would have been supplied, if a ship it would never been allowed to leave the yard by the Classification Society, but in an airplane it is OK? Scary shit.
Then there's the Lithium battery, talk about a disaster waiting to happen. I'll give the "Dreamliner" at least 5 years before I will trust it with my life. 18 months notwithstanding.
Per

User avatar
monchavo
Site Admin
Posts: 1242
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2008 9:21 am

Postby monchavo » Wed Jan 16, 2013 3:46 am

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2013 ... rounds-787

entire fleet grounded @ JAL and ANA

Per, you nearly got your wish....
____
Join the airdisaster Discord - https://discord.gg/A59Vdw73ET

User avatar
Ancient Mariner
Posts: 3774
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 5:24 pm

Re:

Postby Ancient Mariner » Wed Jan 16, 2013 6:23 am

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2013 ... rounds-787

entire fleet grounded @ JAL and ANA

Per, you nearly got your wish....
I do not wish bad things to anyone, but this had me in stitches:
US aviation officials say the aircraft is safe
. :roll:
Per

User avatar
Sickbag
Posts: 2969
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 2:10 pm
Location: Spine-fuhrer of Hoboken

Re: 787 inflight structural breakup in 3....2....1....

Postby Sickbag » Wed Jan 16, 2013 10:00 am

With the two biggest purchasers of the 787 grounding their fleet the tide is rapidly going out for Boeing.

Far from being the shiny new addition to the Boeing family this aircraft has behaved like an bingo-winged incontinent granny with a pyromanic streak.

Time to put her out of our misery I think.
2022: The year of the Squid Singularity

capslock
Posts: 144
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 8:34 am

Re: 787 inflight structural breakup in 3....2....1....

Postby capslock » Wed Jan 16, 2013 12:48 pm

NH203 arrived on time in FRA (ok, it took off about at the time ANA announced the grounding) and NH204 seems to heft left on time about two hours ago, at least according to Fraport info. It also shows as a 787. Flightaware has the flight as on schedule but fails to show position info. NH203/204 for Thursday show as on schedule, but today's flights to Beijing, Seattle and San Jose show as cancelled -> ???

User avatar
3WE
Posts: 8251
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 2:37 pm
Location: Flyover, America

Re:

Postby 3WE » Wed Jan 16, 2013 12:51 pm

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2013 ... rounds-787

entire fleet grounded @ JAL and ANA

Per, you nearly got your wish....
It appears that the escape chute systems performed flawlessly.

(But did they make the time goal?)
Commercial Pilot, Vandelay Industries, Inc., Plant Nutrient Division.

User avatar
Ancient Mariner
Posts: 3774
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 5:24 pm

Re: Re:

Postby Ancient Mariner » Wed Jan 16, 2013 1:40 pm

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2013 ... rounds-787

entire fleet grounded @ JAL and ANA

Per, you nearly got your wish....
It appears that the escape chute systems performed flawlessly.

(But did they make the time goal?)
I noticed that those chutes were pretty steep, meight saving measures?
Per

User avatar
Verbal
Posts: 3579
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 9:04 pm
Location: Planet Bacterion

Re: 787 inflight structural breakup in 3....2....1....

Postby Verbal » Wed Jan 16, 2013 3:43 pm

Top Airlines in Japan Grounding Boeing 787s
The New York Times 01/16/2013
Authors: Hiroko Tabuchi and Jad Mouawad
c. 2012 New York Times Company

TOKYO — Japan’s two largest airlines said Wednesday they would ground their fleets of Boeing’s new 787 aircraft, the Dreamliner, after one operated by All Nippon Airways made an emergency landing in western Japan.

The 137 passengers and crew used emergency slides to exit the aircraft after possible battery trouble and smoke forced the ANA flight to Tokyo from Ube in western Japan to land at Takamatsu airport in southern Japan instead, according to the public broadcaster, NHK. One elderly passenger suffered a slight hip injury during the evacuation, NHK said.

The emergency landing comes after a string of problems in the last month with the aircraft, including a battery fire, fuel leaks, and a cracked cockpit window.

All Nippon said after Wednesday’s incident that it was grounding all 17 of its Dreamliners for inspections. Japan Airlines said it would also temporarily ground the five Boeing 787s it still operates; two others are already undergoing safety checks.

Akihiro Ota, Japan’s transportation minister, said the emergency landing raised concerns over the Dreamliner’s safety, and that he would dispatch safety officials to investigate. “I see this as a serious incident which could have led to a serious accident,” Mr. Ota told reporters in Tokyo.

All Nippon’s vice president, Osamu Shinobe, told a reporters at a news conference at Tokyo’s Haneda Airport, “I apologize for the grave concern and trouble we have caused our passengers, their families and others.” He said the airline was still investigating.

Federal authorities in the United States have also voiced concern about problems the new aircraft has faced but still endorsed it as a safe airplane.

The Federal Aviation Administration last week ordered a comprehensive review of the 787’s manufacturing and design, with a special focus on the plane’s electrical systems. But in a news conference last Thursday, the Transportation Secretary, Ray LaHood, made no mention of a possible grounding of 787s.

Still, the review is unusual and comes 15 months after the 787 entered service after a lengthy certification process by the F.A.A. It comes during a formal investigation by the National Transportation Safety Board into what caused a battery fire in a Japan Airlines plane that had flown to Boston from Tokyo last week.

Late Tuesday in Tokyo, the N.T.S.B. said it was “currently in the process of gathering information about the B-787 emergency landing in Japan earlier today."

Eight airlines now fly the 787: All Nippon Airways and Japan Airlines in Japan currently own 24 of the 50 delivered by Boeing since November 2011. The other operators are Air India, Ethiopian Airlines, Chile’s LAN Airlines, Poland’s LOT, Qatar Airways and United Airlines.

Boeing has sought to ease concerns about the plane’s design and reliability, and insisted it was no more trouble-prone than other new commercial airplane programs. The 787 relies more on electrical systems than previous generations of airplanes. Electrical systems, not mechanical ones, operate hydraulic pumps, de-ice the wings, pressurize the cabin and handle other tasks. The plane also has electric brakes instead of hydraulic ones.

While problems are common with early models — including with the first Airbus A380, the Boeing 777 or even the first 747s — analysts say the issue could become a growing embarrassment for Boeing if travelers or airlines begin to lose confidence in the plane.

So far, safety experts said that the problems with the 787 pointed more to teething problems than structural faults. But the problem is more than just one of reputation for Boeing: the plane maker has said it expects to sell 5,000 787s in the next 20 years, but analysts believe it will be years before it breaks even because of delays.
"I'm putting an end to this f*ckery." - Rayna Boyanov

User avatar
3WE
Posts: 8251
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 2:37 pm
Location: Flyover, America

Re: 787 inflight structural breakup in 3....2....1....

Postby 3WE » Thu Jan 17, 2013 12:05 am

1/16/2012 ~2000Z

FAA grounds the 787
Commercial Pilot, Vandelay Industries, Inc., Plant Nutrient Division.

User avatar
Sir Gallivant
Posts: 1103
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 7:17 pm

Re: 787 inflight structural breakup in 3....2....1....

Postby Sir Gallivant » Thu Jan 17, 2013 6:25 am

1/16/2012 ~2000Z

FAA grounds the 787
So UAL32 about to land at Tokyo (jan 17 0625Z) is the last airborne 787 for a bit?
Veni, Vidi, Velcro!

User avatar
Sickbag
Posts: 2969
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 2:10 pm
Location: Spine-fuhrer of Hoboken

Re: 787 inflight structural breakup in 3....2....1....

Postby Sickbag » Thu Jan 17, 2013 8:20 am

1/16/2012 ~2000Z

FAA grounds the 787
So UAL32 about to land at Tokyo (jan 17 0625Z) is the last airborne 787 for a bit?
I am pleased to report that currently there is no risk of in-flight structural break-up, the FAA have made the 787 safe. :clap:
2022: The year of the Squid Singularity

User avatar
Sir Gallivant
Posts: 1103
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 7:17 pm

Re: 787 inflight structural breakup in 3....2....1....

Postby Sir Gallivant » Thu Jan 17, 2013 10:16 am

And it is grounded in Europe as well.
Veni, Vidi, Velcro!

User avatar
monchavo
Site Admin
Posts: 1242
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2008 9:21 am

Re: 787 inflight structural breakup in 3....2....1....

Postby monchavo » Thu Jan 17, 2013 10:51 am

Per - did you watch the footage of the Japanese businessmen exiting thr 787? Amusingly they all adopted the position shown in the preflight safety video around the posture to adopt when using one of these slides. Asian airlines do this, but EU and American airlines don't... I guess some people must jump down the slides head first ...
____
Join the airdisaster Discord - https://discord.gg/A59Vdw73ET

User avatar
monchavo
Site Admin
Posts: 1242
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2008 9:21 am

Re: 787 inflight structural breakup in 3....2....1....

Postby monchavo » Thu Jan 17, 2013 11:02 am

Air India: 6
All Nippon Airways (Japan): 17
Ethiopian Airlines: 4
Japan Airlines: 7
LAN Airlines (Chile): 3
Lot Polish Airlines: 2
Qatar Airways: 5
United Airlines (US) 6
Total: 50
____
Join the airdisaster Discord - https://discord.gg/A59Vdw73ET

User avatar
Ancient Mariner
Posts: 3774
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 5:24 pm

Re: 787 inflight structural breakup in 3....2....1....

Postby Ancient Mariner » Thu Jan 17, 2013 11:46 am

Per - did you watch the footage of the Japanese businessmen exiting thr 787? Amusingly they all adopted the position shown in the preflight safety video around the posture to adopt when using one of these slides. Asian airlines do this, but EU and American airlines don't... I guess some people must jump down the slides head first ...
I haven't seen the video yet, but I can imagine Japanese businessmen being very faithful to any order or directive given. Chinese on the other hand would have had a fistfight at the door and tumbled down the chutes any which way while clutching their worldy possesions to their chest, smoking, eating and speaking on their cell phone.
Per

User avatar
Sickbag
Posts: 2969
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 2:10 pm
Location: Spine-fuhrer of Hoboken

Re: 787 inflight structural breakup in 3....2....1....

Postby Sickbag » Thu Jan 17, 2013 5:11 pm

The only lithium inside a Boeing aircraft should be in the medication they obviously need to give their 787 designers.
2022: The year of the Squid Singularity

User avatar
3WE
Posts: 8251
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 2:37 pm
Location: Flyover, America

Re: 787 inflight structural breakup in 3....2....1....

Postby 3WE » Thu Jan 17, 2013 5:33 pm

...lithium inside a Boeing aircraft...
[Scottish voice]Captain, the dilithium crystals are overheating, I've got to take the main engines off line, and initiate a precautionary landing actually, we need to ground the whole starfleet[/Scottish voice]

[Kirk]Sulu reduce to warp factor 250, reduce altitude and lay in a course for New Orleans[/Kirk]

http://airdisaster.info/10/forums/viewt ... 884#p59884
Commercial Pilot, Vandelay Industries, Inc., Plant Nutrient Division.

User avatar
Verbal
Posts: 3579
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 9:04 pm
Location: Planet Bacterion

Re: 787 inflight structural breakup in 3....2....1....

Postby Verbal » Thu Jan 17, 2013 5:47 pm

You people are so judgmental. Sniff
"I'm putting an end to this f*ckery." - Rayna Boyanov

User avatar
Ancient Mariner
Posts: 3774
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 5:24 pm

Re: 787 inflight structural breakup in 3....2....1....

Postby Ancient Mariner » Thu Jan 17, 2013 5:52 pm

You people are so judgmental. Sniff
There, there now, it will be OK, eventually.
Per


Return to “Aviation Safety Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests