Are we sentimental about WWII transports?

An open discussion of aviation safety related issues.

Moderators: FrankM, el, Dmmoore

User avatar
3WE
Posts: 8215
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 2:37 pm
Location: Flyover, America

Are we sentimental about WWII transports?

Postby 3WE » Sat Sep 26, 2015 2:42 pm

Commercial Pilot, Vandelay Industries, Inc., Plant Nutrient Division.

User avatar
Not_Karl
Previously banned for not socially distancing
Posts: 4176
Joined: Thu Nov 12, 2009 6:12 pm
Location: Bona Nitogena y otra gaso, Argentina

Re: Are we sentimental about WWII transports?

Postby Not_Karl » Sat Sep 26, 2015 4:15 pm

Yes, we are :cry: ,
International Ban ALL Aeroplanies Association, founder and president.

"I think, based on the types of aircraft listed, you're pretty much guaranteed a fiery death."
- Contemporary Poet flyboy2548m to a Foffie.

User avatar
J
Posts: 1666
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 8:33 pm
Location: South of Canada

Re: Are we sentimental about WWII transports?

Postby J » Sat Sep 26, 2015 6:46 pm

Try this for fast relief.
http://www.b-29doc.com/

User avatar
3WE
Posts: 8215
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 2:37 pm
Location: Flyover, America

Re: Are we sentimental about WWII transports?

Postby 3WE » Sat Sep 26, 2015 9:50 pm

Try this for painfully slow relief.
http://www.b-29doc.com/
Fixed.

Pretty bird, but too many minutes of hot air & silence before / between starts. ;)
Commercial Pilot, Vandelay Industries, Inc., Plant Nutrient Division.

User avatar
flyboy2548m
Posts: 4391
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 12:32 am
Location: Ormond Beach, FL

Re: Are we sentimental about WWII transports?

Postby flyboy2548m » Tue Sep 29, 2015 2:19 pm

I have a lot of respect for Buffalo Joe for running an airline under those conditions for as long as he has. In fact, I respect anyone running ANY business up there for more than a few days, certainly not MY kind of fun.

That being said, I've always found his choice of aircraft puzzling. Considering how moody big round engines can get even in normal climes, using them up there seems like trouble from the start. Having to use oil warmers on every start, carrying gobs of parts, it all strikes me as more trouble than it's worth. Why not CV-580s or even F-27s or YS-11s?
"Lav sinks on 737 Max are too small"

-TeeVee, one of America's finest legal minds.

User avatar
3WE
Posts: 8215
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 2:37 pm
Location: Flyover, America

Re: Are we sentimental about WWII transports?

Postby 3WE » Tue Sep 29, 2015 3:11 pm

From the TV show, although overly-dramatized and edited, there seemed to be plenty of somewhat-significant breakdowns, and the list of accidents at Wikipedia also seems to say "over-due failure of old mechanisms" ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffalo_Airways); and then consider how much expensive and harder-to-find Av-Gas those things must burn...
Commercial Pilot, Vandelay Industries, Inc., Plant Nutrient Division.

User avatar
flyboy2548m
Posts: 4391
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 12:32 am
Location: Ormond Beach, FL

Re: Are we sentimental about WWII transports?

Postby flyboy2548m » Thu Oct 01, 2015 1:57 pm

From the TV show, although overly-dramatized and edited, there seemed to be plenty of somewhat-significant breakdowns, and the list of accidents at Wikipedia also seems to say "over-due failure of old mechanisms" ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffalo_Airways); and then consider how much expensive and harder-to-find Av-Gas those things must burn...
Indeed. In fact, I seem to recall this very C-46 having gear problems before.
"Lav sinks on 737 Max are too small"

-TeeVee, one of America's finest legal minds.

User avatar
Not_Karl
Previously banned for not socially distancing
Posts: 4176
Joined: Thu Nov 12, 2009 6:12 pm
Location: Bona Nitogena y otra gaso, Argentina

Re: Are we sentimental about WWII transports?

Postby Not_Karl » Fri Apr 08, 2016 2:47 pm

Somewhat off topic, but...
An Arall Aerolineas Llaneras Douglas DC-3 (...) was climbing out of Puerto Gaitan when the left hand engine (R-1830) failed. The aircraft lost height, the crew attempted an emergency landing outside the aerodrome. The aircraft burst into flames and was evacuated. Two crew received injuries and were taken to hospitals.
http://avherald.com/h?article=4968a8e1&opt=7168

:cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry:
International Ban ALL Aeroplanies Association, founder and president.

"I think, based on the types of aircraft listed, you're pretty much guaranteed a fiery death."
- Contemporary Poet flyboy2548m to a Foffie.

User avatar
Not_Karl
Previously banned for not socially distancing
Posts: 4176
Joined: Thu Nov 12, 2009 6:12 pm
Location: Bona Nitogena y otra gaso, Argentina

Re: Are we sentimental about WWII transports?

Postby Not_Karl » Fri Apr 08, 2016 3:44 pm

Somewhat off topic, but...
WRONG, completely on-topic.
Untitled.png
Untitled.png (18.11 KiB) Viewed 2621 times
http://rzjets.net/aircraft/?page=74&typeid=275

A PropPhoto of it.
:cry:
International Ban ALL Aeroplanies Association, founder and president.

"I think, based on the types of aircraft listed, you're pretty much guaranteed a fiery death."
- Contemporary Poet flyboy2548m to a Foffie.

User avatar
3WE
Posts: 8215
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 2:37 pm
Location: Flyover, America

Re: Are we sentimental about WWII transports?

Postby 3WE » Fri Apr 08, 2016 10:46 pm

Sturdy, metallic construction + 172-like performance = frequent occupant survival.

But the plane did died :(
Commercial Pilot, Vandelay Industries, Inc., Plant Nutrient Division.


Return to “Aviation Safety Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests