United 777 sheds engine parts
Moderators: FrankM, el, Dmmoore
- Rabbi O'Genius
- Posts: 770
- Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 12:37 am
- Location: Hauts de Seine
United 777 sheds engine parts
......never send to know for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee. – John Donne
Re: United 777 sheds engine parts
A most splendid shedding.
____
Join the airdisaster Discord - https://discord.gg/A59Vdw73ET
Join the airdisaster Discord - https://discord.gg/A59Vdw73ET
Re: United 777 sheds engine parts
Uncontained engine failure. Wait and watch.
Re: United 777 sheds engine parts
What makes you think the blade was uncontained?
"I'm putting an end to this f*ckery." - Rayna Boyanov
Re: United 777 sheds engine parts
Blade missing, casing punctured, cowling gone. Not conclusive but nice circumstantial evidence.What makes you think the blade was uncontained?
Re: United 777 sheds engine parts
Neat first-person account just posted: https://youtu.be/J7_lzeY23dI
BTW... Gabe... why do you call this one an uncontained failure and not the Denver event?
BTW... Gabe... why do you call this one an uncontained failure and not the Denver event?
HR consultant, Yoyodyne Propulsion Systems, Inc.
Re: United 777 sheds engine parts
That was 3 years ago when we were stupid, ass-hat, outsiders parlour talkers. I think he thought, that the largely missing cowling meant that stuff had blown outward through the containment.BTW... Gabe... why do you call this one an uncontained failure and not the Denver event?
We have since learned that crappy Boeing cowlings let go due to minor vibrations when half a blade is gone.
Now we are STILL stupid, ass-hat, outsider parlour talkers, but have even MORE irritating questions for the insiders like flyboy, Dummy, Bobby, Bradley and Verbally.
(We not italicized as we are not making important recommendations to the industry, other than we think some more duct tape and bailing wire are in order to secure blades and cowlings.)
Commercial Pilot, Vandelay Industries, Inc., Plant Nutrient Division.
Re: United 777 sheds engine parts
I don't like that channel very much, but that video was very good.Neat first-person account just posted: https://youtu.be/J7_lzeY23dI
BTW... Gabe... why do you call this one an uncontained failure and not the Denver event?
As to your question, as I said before:
But in the end it was not uncontained either (even when a piece of blade hit the fuselage, but it was at low velocity, it made a small dent and scratch but no puncture).Blade missing, casing punctured, cowling gone. Not conclusive but nice circumstantial evidence.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 16 guests