Air France Relentless Pull Up: Beating the dead horse...again...
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2018 8:07 pm
Ok, I have only loosely been following the Evan admonition and Boeing Bobby declarations and Gabriel's and my own spam-waste-of-bytes there on the Russian-apparent-UAS crash.
But (question) have a perceived a trend that for in a lot of cases of UAS, you establish full power and a healthy climb? (Seems like Bobby and maybe Gabby and maybe Evanie said that).
Then we have the ole stall gripe where recovery was full power and establish a healthy climb.
What I'm saying here- is that this would tend to support that theory that maybe Bonin was not a total idiot, but thinking that pulling the stick back would get the plane to automatically assume a maximum performance climb with stall protection...
To me the question has always been "what in the hell was he thinking"...
I used to have a few more doubts at this theory, but if UAS was full power and climb, this supports that theory more...
/endless parlour talk
But (question) have a perceived a trend that for in a lot of cases of UAS, you establish full power and a healthy climb? (Seems like Bobby and maybe Gabby and maybe Evanie said that).
Then we have the ole stall gripe where recovery was full power and establish a healthy climb.
What I'm saying here- is that this would tend to support that theory that maybe Bonin was not a total idiot, but thinking that pulling the stick back would get the plane to automatically assume a maximum performance climb with stall protection...
To me the question has always been "what in the hell was he thinking"...
I used to have a few more doubts at this theory, but if UAS was full power and climb, this supports that theory more...
/endless parlour talk