Short Field Takeoff.
Moderators: FrankM, el, Dmmoore
Short Field Takeoff.
I saw this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SI4Jnyph ... re=related
I thought it was kind of cool.
Then I saw this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vNDoo7wf42o&NR=1
Same stuff, but an order of magnitude bigger.
I worried a bit about the 150 guy not levling just a bit to build a little speed, but perhaps it's got a STOL kit and he had a healthy margin above stall? Am I counting paint blobs right, the 757 got off in 1,500 ft?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SI4Jnyph ... re=related
I thought it was kind of cool.
Then I saw this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vNDoo7wf42o&NR=1
Same stuff, but an order of magnitude bigger.
I worried a bit about the 150 guy not levling just a bit to build a little speed, but perhaps it's got a STOL kit and he had a healthy margin above stall? Am I counting paint blobs right, the 757 got off in 1,500 ft?
Commercial Pilot, Vandelay Industries, Inc., Plant Nutrient Division.
- RadarContactLost
- Posts: 194
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 9:38 pm
- Location: Northern District of the Republic of Texas
Re: Short Field Takeoff.
The idea of a high speed pass in a 150 is mind numbing.
You're not a Freight Dawg unless you've shot the ILS to 23L at KYIP in a transport category aircraft no longer used in passenger service. You're OG if it had a tailwheel or BMEP gauges.
Re: Short Field Takeoff.
IndeedThe idea of a high speed pass in a 150 is mind numbing.
Commercial Pilot, Vandelay Industries, Inc., Plant Nutrient Division.
-
- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 2:02 am
Re: Short Field Takeoff.
I think the 150 guy displays very good "stick & rudder" skills but poor judgement.
He is playing too close to the limits and leaving all margin out.
The short T/O, keeping a high AOA after lift-off, followed by a very low altitude /very low speed / high AOA climbing turn!!!
He lands SHORT of the pavement twice!!!
He puts a camera close to the T/O landing path!!! (I wonder if there was a person behind that camera).
If he keeps flying like that he will once make a minor mistake or suffer another problem (an engine cough, an unexpected gust, etc...) that will put him outside the envelope and without margin to recover. The end.
Now about the 757...
It was a performance display. Probably the airplane was as light as it gets, say 50% of MTOW. Compared to a MTOW take-off:
At 50% MTOW the acceleration is doubled.
Not only that, but at 50% MTOW Vs, and hence Vr and Vlo, is 70% (maybe the pilots even over-rotated a bit and a bit below Vr, but let's not consider that)
So we have
a=2aMTOW
Vlo=0.7VloMTOW
Vlo=a*t ==> t=Vlo/a=0.7VloMTOW/2aMTOW=0.35tMTOW (the light 757 would lift-off in 35% of the time of the heavy one)
d=1/2*a*t^2=1/2*2aMTOW*(0.35tMTOW)^2=0.1225*aMTOW*tMTOW^2=0.245dMTOW
So for a very very light 757 it would take roughly 1/4 of the runway to lift off compared to one at MTOW.
He is playing too close to the limits and leaving all margin out.
The short T/O, keeping a high AOA after lift-off, followed by a very low altitude /very low speed / high AOA climbing turn!!!
He lands SHORT of the pavement twice!!!
He puts a camera close to the T/O landing path!!! (I wonder if there was a person behind that camera).
If he keeps flying like that he will once make a minor mistake or suffer another problem (an engine cough, an unexpected gust, etc...) that will put him outside the envelope and without margin to recover. The end.
Now about the 757...
It was a performance display. Probably the airplane was as light as it gets, say 50% of MTOW. Compared to a MTOW take-off:
At 50% MTOW the acceleration is doubled.
Not only that, but at 50% MTOW Vs, and hence Vr and Vlo, is 70% (maybe the pilots even over-rotated a bit and a bit below Vr, but let's not consider that)
So we have
a=2aMTOW
Vlo=0.7VloMTOW
Vlo=a*t ==> t=Vlo/a=0.7VloMTOW/2aMTOW=0.35tMTOW (the light 757 would lift-off in 35% of the time of the heavy one)
d=1/2*a*t^2=1/2*2aMTOW*(0.35tMTOW)^2=0.1225*aMTOW*tMTOW^2=0.245dMTOW
So for a very very light 757 it would take roughly 1/4 of the runway to lift off compared to one at MTOW.
- RadarContactLost
- Posts: 194
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 9:38 pm
- Location: Northern District of the Republic of Texas
Re: Short Field Takeoff.
"Oh, the humidity."
You're not a Freight Dawg unless you've shot the ILS to 23L at KYIP in a transport category aircraft no longer used in passenger service. You're OG if it had a tailwheel or BMEP gauges.
Re: Short Field Takeoff.
X = paint blobs every 500 ft.I think the 150 guy displays very good "stick & rudder" skills but poor judgement.
He is playing too close to the limits and leaving all margin out.
The short T/O, keeping a high AOA after lift-off, followed by a very low altitude /very low speed / high AOA climbing turn!!!
He lands SHORT of the pavement twice!!!
He puts a camera close to the T/O landing path!!! (I wonder if there was a person behind that camera).
If he keeps flying like that he will once make a minor mistake or suffer another problem (an engine cough, an unexpected gust, etc...) that will put him outside the envelope and without margin to recover. The end.
Now about the 757...
It was a performance display. Probably the airplane was as light as it gets, say 50% of MTOW. Compared to a MTOW take-off:
At 50% MTOW the acceleration is doubled.
Not only that, but at 50% MTOW Vs, and hence Vr and Vlo, is 70% (maybe the pilots even over-rotated a bit and a bit below Vr, but let's not consider that)
So we have
a=2aMTOW
Vlo=0.7VloMTOW
Vlo=a*t ==> t=Vlo/a=0.7VloMTOW/2aMTOW=0.35tMTOW (the light 757 would lift-off in 35% of the time of the heavy one)
d=1/2*a*t^2=1/2*2aMTOW*(0.35tMTOW)^2=0.1225*aMTOW*tMTOW^2=0.245dMTOW
So for a very very light 757 it would take roughly 1/4 of the runway to lift off compared to one at MTOW.
Y = 6000 ft takeoff distance for a 757
3X = observed takeoff distance at airshow.
0.25 = Gabes light weight takeoff correction factor.
Y * 0.25 = 3X
All is well.
Commercial Pilot, Vandelay Industries, Inc., Plant Nutrient Division.
- Dmmoore
- 08/12/1946 - 06/05/2009 Rest In Peace
- Posts: 1002
- Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 3:07 pm
- Location: Prescott, AZ. USA
Re: Short Field Takeoff.
Don
As accomplished by managers around the world
READY - FIRE - AIM!
As accomplished by managers around the world
READY - FIRE - AIM!
-
- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 2:02 am
Re: Short Field Takeoff.
Re: Short Field Takeoff.
Now watch this landing in the bush...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RuWs_HNz ... re=related
or this one...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ID-E9DFV ... re=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RuWs_HNz ... re=related
or this one...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ID-E9DFV ... re=related
-
- Posts: 850
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 1:19 am
Re: Short Field Takeoff.
That's what I'm talking about ,Baby!Now watch this landing in the bush...
Re: Short Field Takeoff.
Those days only possible with older models ...That's what I'm talking about ,Baby!Now watch this landing in the bush...
Wir sind dann mal oben !
Re: Short Field Takeoff.
Just don't try it in a Mad Dog at La GuardiaThat's what I'm talking about ,Baby!Now watch this landing in the bush...
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Semrush [Bot] and 13 guests