B-52, It keeps going and going...

Discuss all aspects of military aviation here!

Moderators: MikeD, Robert Hilton

User avatar
3WE
Posts: 4636
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 2:37 pm
Location: Flyover, America

B-52, It keeps going and going...

Postby 3WE » Mon Jan 29, 2018 2:04 pm

...and Evan thinks the 737 has seen it's day.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vHdIRwKtnig

(Gross feel-good, promotional film by Verbie and Bradlee.)

PS: I would THINK the great engineers would change this to a four-engine aircraft???
Commercial Pilot, Vandelay Industries, Inc., Plant Nutrient Division.

User avatar
Gabriel
Posts: 1791
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2008 2:55 am
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina

Re: B-52, It keeps going and going...

Postby Gabriel » Mon Jan 29, 2018 3:40 pm

Yes.

User avatar
ocelot
Posts: 324
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 9:26 pm

Re: B-52, It keeps going and going...

Postby ocelot » Mon Feb 12, 2018 5:41 am

From a pure thrust perspective you could probably get away with two, although there are a number of reasons not to. (e.g. rudder authority) However, moving to four seems necessary to get most of the touted advantages. If nothing else, to get the efficiency improvements you want a high-bypass design and that's just not going to fit in the existing 8-way nacelles. Also, all else being equal having 4 engines instead of 8 gives roughly twice the dispatch reliability...

User avatar
Gabriel
Posts: 1791
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2008 2:55 am
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina

Re: B-52, It keeps going and going...

Postby Gabriel » Tue Feb 13, 2018 1:07 pm

From a pure thrust perspective you could probably get away with two, although there are a number of reasons not to. (e.g. rudder authority
Would you care to explain that? Do you mean making it a twin?

User avatar
flyboy2548m
Posts: 3847
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 12:32 am
Location: Ormond Beach, FL

Re: B-52, It keeps going and going...

Postby flyboy2548m » Tue Feb 20, 2018 8:59 pm

From a pure thrust perspective you could probably get away with two...
Hell. why not with one? Just stick a Saturn rocket or some such on its back (3MT-style) and off you go!
"Lav sinks on 737 Max are too small"

-TeeVee, one of America's finest legal minds.

User avatar
Not_Karl
Posts: 2356
Joined: Thu Nov 12, 2009 6:12 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: B-52, It keeps going and going...

Postby Not_Karl » Tue Feb 20, 2018 10:21 pm

From a pure thrust perspective you could probably get away with two...
Hell. why not with one? Just stick a Saturn rocket or some such on its back (3MT-style) and off you go!
Why not zero? It would make a really badass glider, considerably decrease maintenance costs and points of failure and, more importantly, eliminate the risk of stupid pilots monkeying with the power levers.
Junior Janitor, Vandelay Industries, Inc., Environmental Poisoning Assurance department.

"I think, based on the types of aircraft listed, you're pretty much guaranteed a fiery death."
- Contemporary Poet flyboy2548m to a Foffie.

User avatar
3WE
Posts: 4636
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 2:37 pm
Location: Flyover, America

Re: B-52, It keeps going and going...

Postby 3WE » Fri Feb 23, 2018 5:07 pm

From a pure thrust perspective you could probably get away with two, although there are a number of reasons not to. (e.g. rudder authority
Would you care to explain that? Do you mean making it a twin?
Explanation: Ocelot said, "From a pure thrust standpoint"

Context matters.

In that context- (that, and Flyboy's suggestion) makes sense.

...and yes, Ocelot is saying that there are engines out there with enough thrust where two would propel a B-52...I don't doubt that...
Commercial Pilot, Vandelay Industries, Inc., Plant Nutrient Division.

elaw
Posts: 428
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2014 7:01 pm
Location: Massachusetts, USA

Re: B-52, It keeps going and going...

Postby elaw » Fri Feb 23, 2018 8:31 pm

And just for reference, here's a photo of one:
Image

:mrgreen:
HR consultant, Yoyodyne Propulsion Systems, Inc.

User avatar
ocelot
Posts: 324
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 9:26 pm

Re: B-52, It keeps going and going...

Postby ocelot » Sun Feb 25, 2018 5:31 am

Yes; the existing eight engines add up to less than two of those PW4077s.

User avatar
Not_Karl
Posts: 2356
Joined: Thu Nov 12, 2009 6:12 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: B-52, It keeps going and going...

Postby Not_Karl » Sun Feb 25, 2018 2:11 pm

Yes; the existing eight engines add up to less than two of those PW4077s.
Less thrust or less explosiveness? :mrgreen:
Junior Janitor, Vandelay Industries, Inc., Environmental Poisoning Assurance department.

"I think, based on the types of aircraft listed, you're pretty much guaranteed a fiery death."
- Contemporary Poet flyboy2548m to a Foffie.

User avatar
3WE
Posts: 4636
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 2:37 pm
Location: Flyover, America

Re: B-52, It keeps going and going...

Postby 3WE » Sun Feb 25, 2018 11:06 pm

And just for reference, here's a photo of one:

[A jetphoto with much background clutter and windowframe clutter in the foreground, a human interest person with his head totally blocked, unsharpened, poorly lit, and etc...but definitely a unique and special configuration, therefore acceptable... ]

:mrgreen:
That would look great on that B-52 where the tail fell off!
Commercial Pilot, Vandelay Industries, Inc., Plant Nutrient Division.


Return to “Military Aviation Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests