...and Evan thinks the 737 has seen it's day.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vHdIRwKtnig
(Gross feel-good, promotional film by Verbie and Bradlee.)
PS: I would THINK the great engineers would change this to a four-engine aircraft???
B-52, It keeps going and going...
Moderators: MikeD, Robert Hilton
B-52, It keeps going and going...
Commercial Pilot, Vandelay Industries, Inc., Plant Nutrient Division.
Re: B-52, It keeps going and going...
From a pure thrust perspective you could probably get away with two, although there are a number of reasons not to. (e.g. rudder authority) However, moving to four seems necessary to get most of the touted advantages. If nothing else, to get the efficiency improvements you want a high-bypass design and that's just not going to fit in the existing 8-way nacelles. Also, all else being equal having 4 engines instead of 8 gives roughly twice the dispatch reliability...
Re: B-52, It keeps going and going...
Would you care to explain that? Do you mean making it a twin?From a pure thrust perspective you could probably get away with two, although there are a number of reasons not to. (e.g. rudder authority
- flyboy2548m
- Posts: 4391
- Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 12:32 am
- Location: Ormond Beach, FL
Re: B-52, It keeps going and going...
Hell. why not with one? Just stick a Saturn rocket or some such on its back (3MT-style) and off you go!From a pure thrust perspective you could probably get away with two...
"Lav sinks on 737 Max are too small"
-TeeVee, one of America's finest legal minds.
-TeeVee, one of America's finest legal minds.
- Not_Karl
- Previously banned for not socially distancing
- Posts: 4174
- Joined: Thu Nov 12, 2009 6:12 pm
- Location: Bona Nitogena y otra gaso, Argentina
Re: B-52, It keeps going and going...
Why not zero? It would make a really badass glider, considerably decrease maintenance costs and points of failure and, more importantly, eliminate the risk of stupid pilots monkeying with the power levers.Hell. why not with one? Just stick a Saturn rocket or some such on its back (3MT-style) and off you go!From a pure thrust perspective you could probably get away with two...
International Ban ALL Aeroplanies Association, founder and president.
"I think, based on the types of aircraft listed, you're pretty much guaranteed a fiery death."
- Contemporary Poet flyboy2548m to a Foffie.
"I think, based on the types of aircraft listed, you're pretty much guaranteed a fiery death."
- Contemporary Poet flyboy2548m to a Foffie.
Re: B-52, It keeps going and going...
Explanation: Ocelot said, "From a pure thrust standpoint"Would you care to explain that? Do you mean making it a twin?From a pure thrust perspective you could probably get away with two, although there are a number of reasons not to. (e.g. rudder authority
Context matters.
In that context- (that, and Flyboy's suggestion) makes sense.
...and yes, Ocelot is saying that there are engines out there with enough thrust where two would propel a B-52...I don't doubt that...
Commercial Pilot, Vandelay Industries, Inc., Plant Nutrient Division.
Re: B-52, It keeps going and going...
And just for reference, here's a photo of one:
HR consultant, Yoyodyne Propulsion Systems, Inc.
Re: B-52, It keeps going and going...
Yes; the existing eight engines add up to less than two of those PW4077s.
- Not_Karl
- Previously banned for not socially distancing
- Posts: 4174
- Joined: Thu Nov 12, 2009 6:12 pm
- Location: Bona Nitogena y otra gaso, Argentina
Re: B-52, It keeps going and going...
Less thrust or less explosiveness?Yes; the existing eight engines add up to less than two of those PW4077s.
International Ban ALL Aeroplanies Association, founder and president.
"I think, based on the types of aircraft listed, you're pretty much guaranteed a fiery death."
- Contemporary Poet flyboy2548m to a Foffie.
"I think, based on the types of aircraft listed, you're pretty much guaranteed a fiery death."
- Contemporary Poet flyboy2548m to a Foffie.
Re: B-52, It keeps going and going...
That would look great on that B-52 where the tail fell off!And just for reference, here's a photo of one:
[A jetphoto with much background clutter and windowframe clutter in the foreground, a human interest person with his head totally blocked, unsharpened, poorly lit, and etc...but definitely a unique and special configuration, therefore acceptable... ]
Commercial Pilot, Vandelay Industries, Inc., Plant Nutrient Division.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests