F.A.O.: 3WE

[3WE]

Berntie is also aware that there is a photography, Not_aviation, forum

[not_italics]We do both…

…better

[Not_Karl]

Berntie is also aware that there is a photography, Not_aviation, forum

[not_italics]We do both…

…better

INDEED.

[Not_Karl]

Threeweeie, there, on Evanie's beliefs;
...pilots and fundamental airmanship are bad
I thought we all AGREEd on that

ATLCrewboyie, there, on El Idioma Inglés Not_being Berntie's first:

Sorry to hear that. Go ahead, ask me what number language English is for me. Please.

Let's see what Berntie, being one of them, does.
We would either:
-Not_ask him, just state a number as fact because we always know better.
-Ask him, but challenge his answer because we always know better.
Then, of course, discuss the subject in hundreds of interwebz forum posts.

[3WE]

As you might imagine, I liked his razz of Evanie more than Berntie.

The biggest ironing is that Berntie cited his credentials and ATLboy seems to be chipping away at his facts.

[Not_Karl]

Gabie, there:

In general no. It is a myth (at least in airliners) that bounces are the result of hard touchdowns or that hard touchdowns result in a bounce, as many super rough landings with no or minimum bounce can attest.

Oleo-pneumatic shock absorbers in transport category planes are close to critically damped, so no bounce.
The biggest factor in a bounce is the late and/or large flare rotation (many times to mitigate a hard landing, and many times not succeeding hence the correlation), which causes that after the landing gear (mainly the shock absorbers) reduced the vertical speed to zero, the plane has more lift than weight. So up we go. It is more a "re-take-off" than a "bounce".

But what if the aeroplanie lands hard on a trampoline?

[Gabriel]

But what if the aeroplanie lands hard on a trampoline?

The trampoline breaks so still no.

[Not_Karl]

...asked Evanie about his background.
We didn't get an answer (as usual).
Berntie thinks he may be a Q400 pilot. I do Not_ (I think Evanie's avatar shows the view from a passenger, Not_cockpit, window... but, above all, I would find hard to believe the Dash 8 Not_being in his no-fly list...).

[3WE]

...asked Evanie about his background.
We didn't get an answer (as usual).
Berntie thinks he may be a Q400 pilot. I do Not_ (I think Evanie's avatar shows the view from a passenger, Not_cockpit, window... but, above all, I would find hard to believe the Dash 8 Not_being in his no-fly list...).

There certainly has some entertainment value.

[Gabriel]

(I think Evanie's avatar shows the view from a passenger, Not_cockpit, window... but, above all, I would find hard to believe the Dash 8 Not_being in his no-fly list...).

Exactly what I thought:
1) Who told you it was taken from the cockpit?
2) Who told you it was taken by Evan?

[3WE]

(I think Evanie's avatar shows the view from a passenger, Not_cockpit, window... but, above all, I would find hard to believe the Dash 8 Not_being in his no-fly list...).

Exactly what I thought:
1) Who told you it was taken from the cockpit?
2) Who told you it was taken by Evan?

2:

Berntie, based on the angles, felt strongly that Evanie’s Avatar was from a Q-400. (Ok, see what he’s saying, BUT bet a beer it’s more like seat 1D.)

The photo is pretty definitely in-flight, so IF it’s from the copilots seat, that would suggest Evan is a first officer.

1:

I think Evanie claims he took his own Avatar pic. It’s a cool pic, even though it has numerous issues for their standards. Does that prove he took it? No, and Not_Karls joke-with-truth statement that it’s questionable than Evanie would get on a death trap operated by newer puppy mill pilots and people who can’t get hired at the majors…that’s insightful.

[Not_Karl]

…and TeeVee asked a most-awesome lawyer question: “Has Evan ever screwed the pooch on anything?”

(Or as I like to say, has he ever fallen off his bicycle…something that gives most of us a little perspective on being human).

I'm 101% perfect and still have fallen from my bicycle due to external factors...

[3WE]

…and TeeVee asked a most-awesome lawyer question: “Has Evan ever screwed the pooch on anything?”

(Or as I like to say, has he ever fallen off his bicycle…something that gives most of us a little perspective on being human).

I'm 101% perfect and still have fallen from my bicycle due to external factors...

No question: You are the International Super Genius Rider of the Millennium on how bicycle operations can crash and injure or did died you. You are THE poster child of the concept!

Even with your perfect adherence to the BCOM, ROH, QRH, RIM, FBR, type specific training and valid experiences from Tres Wheelos de Mas Circumfrencia y Carritos de rulemanes and memory checklists, human factors of a truck driver caught up with you. Thus giving you insight on what happens when you step away from the keyboard and leave the sterile, padded bubble.

Indeed.

[3WE]

Seems to be a sensitive subject…

And requires GMO popcorn.

Shall I pile on?

[Not_Karl]

And requires GMO popcorn.

INDEED. I'd ask ChatPGT who Evanie is... But I fear that if it replies with an evasive "I'm sorry, Dave, I can't answer that" it would mean that Evanie is actually AI...

Nobody on this forum needs to explain their avatar pic.

I'm SO waiting for someone to ask about my avatar there, to scold them for Not_recognizing the Official Flyover ATM's mascot...

I actually like the idea of destroyers near watery aeroporties. They could destroy aeroplanies that touch-down hard and go-around due to stupid, fatigued cowmonkey pilots before they inevitably crash. Of course, we should put some guarded switches so stupid, fatigued seamonkeys don't accidentally fire a nuke or something...

[Not_Karl]

You are THE poster child...

Please don't EVER call me that there.

BBie:

Having flown during both Gulf Wars, in and out of places that most civilians have never heard of, and a few I can't tell anyone about

I miss Kentie, I would love to read how he tops that .
(At least we still have Evanie, who can't tell anyone about his background).

[3WE]

You are THE poster child...

Please don't EVER call me that there.

I would not_worry.

You are indeed an adult, and do not_display Evanie’s childish views on aviation matters.

Arguably, [not_italics]we, take childish delight in the debate, there.

In the arena de idiomas de lingues, “poster child” means “excellent example” as opposed to child-like, so do not_be offended if by a (1-in-a-million) human error, I say that you are the poster child of bicycle safety, there.

I will do my best, to instead say “international, super-relevant, bicycle-risk example of the millennium and genius, for whom, English is a second language (see footnote).

Footnote: Damn, I feel like a minority.

[3WE]

However, lots of guarded switches and slight hyperbole on Evans’s view of pilots.

https://www.facebook.com/share/r/5W82Le ... tid=qDwCgo

[Not_Karl]

However, lots of guarded switches and slight hyperbole on Evans’s view of pilots.

https://www.facebook.com/share/r/5W82Le ... tid=qDwCgo

He didn't pull the fire handles?

[Gabriel]

However, lots of guarded switches and slight hyperbole on Evans’s view of pilots.

https://www.facebook.com/share/r/5W82Le ... tid=qDwCgo

He didn't pull the fire handles?

I don't know, but he did jettison the canopy.

[Not_Karl]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ypx0Q2t_R1g

[Not_Karl]

Forget about Evanie's background, we NEED to know what avatar TeeieVeeie did/didn't have during his first month of life there.

Conspiracy theory: TeeieVeeie did have an avatar during that month - it was a picture of Evanie's workplace.

[3WE]

Forget about Evanie's background, we NEED to know what avatar TeeieVeeie did/didn't have during his first month of life there.

Conspiracy theory: TeeieVeeie did have an avatar during that month - it was a picture of Evanie's workplace.

Good thought.

However, I think I will stick to trolling Evan about his bicycle experience and strong thoughts on face diapers.

[Not_Karl]

By the way, in an emergency, it’s 0 PSI to the brakes

No wonder trainies don't brake...

[3WE]

By the way, in an emergency, it’s 0 PSI to the brakes

No wonder trainies don't brake...

Because I do not_trust Gabriel, The Piss-Poor Trainbrakeengineer, to actually chime in with edifying comments, I wanted to remind everyone that 0 PSI in the brake pipe sends roughly 90 (maybe slightly less) PSI from the on-car air reservoir to the brake cylinders- ass-uming the engineer is not_an ass-hat outsider that screwed around and depleted the air reserves, which is something we might do when playing MS train simulator.

And also, there are dynamic brakes are when the traction motors are "switched" to generate electricity which is "burned" in huge resistor grids with significant cooling fans. (Again, just being Gabriel)

Several examples are shown in our much-superior railroad thread, here. Including J's post of toaster-red dynamic brake grids- which is almost as cool as a 727, which is the aeroplanie Boeing should truly be keeping alive.

And to be complete- ban all trains for the sake of Not_Karl and add more regulation, oversight, training, procedures, systems, automation, screening and public physical punishment for stupid engineers for the sake of Evan.

[J]

I thank you for those comments.
Getting back to railroading, brakes are fine but how about amps? Here is a blog discussing locomotive chemtrails as well as a 4 axle GE locomotive in the DANGER ZONE generating 1675 amps for 35 minutes. In normal operation, anything more than 5 minutes at this load would cause the computer control to derate the power. But when it is as cold as an airliner outside the motors kept their cool almost to the top of the grade.

http://krugtales.50megs.com/rrpictale/p ... 030224.htm