Did he just say that it is ok to bank more in the base-to-final turn with no power?




Most likely neither.noYES
But do run naked in the woods.Don't get did durnked.Ceremony at 1300 PST today.
Possibly not.Possibly.Are you Horscht?
Are you Karl?
I suggest one saying "RETARD, RETARD"
Have you ever considered AD.info merch as a source of funding? I suggest t-shirts with "PULL UP" written on the front and "RELENTLESSLY" on the back.![]()
Are you Horscht?Regards, Dr. Sigmund von Verbal
Regards, Dr. Sigmund von Horscht
No doubt.some of us refuse to understand such a basic and obvious concept.
The brand new MD-152!New 757 WHEN?!?!?![]()
Cue: OPAs a wise man once said...People making portrait videos should be banned from www.internet.com. People making portrait videos with a tiny landscape video in the middle should be banned from the Earth.
A stabilized straight-in 3-degree approach can be problematic when the flight path intersects the topology of a celestial body.I could also be Evan and suggest that they are not lined up, on glideslopes (and on speed) for the stabilized approach gate thing of grand procedural operation.
The rampie was as close to did diededness as it gets. And his underware was a total loss.Bump: Unfortunately the movie is now private, but an E-170 sucks a safety cone out of the rampies hand. The cone did died, and the engine probably got rebuilt.
I think it's accurate. Scary from outside and deafening from inside.https://www.facebook.com/reel/241096751 ... e&s=TIeQ9V
I’m not sure this is 100% accurate, but it does look interesting.
I don't remember if it was an alcornoque or a palo borracho.Was it a palm tree?I once tried to have a rational discussion with a tree with about the same results.
Genuine off-board video isn't either.Serious note for Gabriel: Yes, the "fake" on-board video is not_consistent with that.
I don't understand why that would be the case, but it is.but somehow or other, it’s been a massive improvement in safety.