Oh my...

I wonder what Wonnzie is doing these days...

This does look a bit bad since the storm was fairly short lived, often not excessive in snow amounts and now gone for few days. 1. The storm was active for 3 days, which, in airline terms, is a lifetime. 2. The storm went through the busiest travel areas of the country. 3. Some stations are still d...

Notice the warning cares nothing about what law or lawlessness you're in. It will keep blaring until you unstall the airplane. You're welcome, Gabito, keep on keeping on.

my provisional (meaning not definitive) conclusion is that the stall warning is probably inhibited or non-existing in normal law.

Wonderful. Now read the article again. Carefully.

Admit I am not good at getting cues.

More's the pity.

https://media.ambito.com/p/d9789a11273639ba7d22119b0a99313e/adjuntos/351/imagenes/040/366/0040366985/730x0/smart/messi-seleccion-argentina-mundial.jpg I have to admit, The Little Man deserved it. It would have been the pinnacle of unfairness for Little Man to retire without a Cup while Mbappe would...

I could imagine someone proposing that the Airbus is unstallable in normal law so let's get rid of the warning. I assure you, nobody at Airbus ever proposed any such thing. At least, not without a very major qualifying word, which I, as a current Airbus pilot, have mentioned on these pages before. ...

Because I think that the stall warning is not active in normal law (I can be wrong). Indeed you can be. But I am? I could explain it to you piece-by-piece but you'll just disagree, so I'll save my breath. But maybe you can explain to me why stall warning would NOT be active in normal law? Why would...

Because I think that the stall warning is not active in normal law (I can be wrong).

Indeed you can be.

We better ask Evan exactly how this works./blue font.

Please do. My CREDENTIALS are too numerous for Gabriel to believe me, so...

Does it require pilot input to restore normal law or is it automatic once certain criteria is met?

Depends on the original failure.

(Tangential question: how the hell do you taxi safely in a big-engine taildragger where you can't see jack out the front when it's on the ground?)

S-turns.

In fact, and Flyboy my confirm or correct this (or other), I seem to remember that once an Airbus goes into alternate law it remains in alternate law for the remainder of the flight. Negative, Ghostrider. The only abnormal law that is "permanent" until landing is Abnormal Attitude Law. Al...

I can take the place over and ban all of your worthless behinds!

Yes.

It had a mid-mounted engine (as in, behind the cockpit), which in theory would allow a shorter nose and improve visibility. But looking at the plane, it doesn't seem to have made much difference.

That's not why Bell went with that configuration.

Both of the speakists talk about visibility, but there's another term for a fighter with poor cockpit visibility: "target". Maybe the P-61 is worse than average because it's supposed to be a bomber-killer... First of all, it was a P-63, but I'll let that slide for the moment. Second of al...

There's also mild amusement from there at the loss of the aeroplanie being worse than the loss of peoplies...(yeah, we might sometimes say that here, too). I don't disconcur with that sentiment, the number of fat-walleted geezers who want to relive their parents' war far exceeds the number of airwo...

I figured he wouldn't be too long...

Confederate Air Force strikes again! Tell me it ain't so!

We have been informed that the 737 is Not_a modern airliner, but a relic that should have been retired by now.

That is all.

Also, everything that does not have "cables" is "solid-state".

Hard to tell from the video, but it looks like the spoilers never popped up.

If your computer needs liquid cooling complete with a radiator, you got bigger problems than just flight sim.

Is the “Washington Monument” a “classic localizer” that gets insanely accurate as you get closer than on an ILS landing, or is it computer “enhanced” where deviations are a “constant distance per dot”/whatevermoreorless? What? Does it Basically behave like an OBS needle: less sensitive as you begin...

Is the “Washington Monument” a “classic localizer” that gets insanely accurate as you get closer than on an ILS landing, or is it computer “enhanced” where deviations are a “constant distance per dot”/whatevermoreorless?

What?