Runway overrun (apparently no slats/flaps

http://avherald.com/h?article=4407f71a&opt=1


Moderators: el, FrankM, Dmmoore
Very little known fact: The 738 was intended as a Navy plane, the folding of the fuselage at row 8 would make it easier to park a number of aircraft tightly on a carrier deck.is it just me, or do 738's have a habit in breaking in two around row 8?
You had that tour guide, too? What a coincidence.Very little known fact: The 738 was intended as a Navy plane, the folding of the fuselage at row 8 would make it easier to park a number of aircraft tightly on a carrier deck.is it just me, or do 738's have a habit in breaking in two around row 8?
Then why is such a maneuver part of most type rating checkrides?The flaps up landing is a practice that is generally frowned upon, for obvious reasons.
C'mon flyboy. Flaps up landing = more wear and tear on the brakes, faster touchdown speed, longer roll out, thus it is generally frowned upon.Then why is such a maneuver part of most type rating checkrides?The flaps up landing is a practice that is generally frowned upon, for obvious reasons.
The point you (not surprisingly) missed is that landing flaps up is no excuse to end up with the airplane in two pieces.C'mon flyboy. Flaps up landing = more wear and tear on the brakes, faster touchdown speed, longer roll out, thus it is generally frowned upon.Then why is such a maneuver part of most type rating checkrides?The flaps up landing is a practice that is generally frowned upon, for obvious reasons.
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 63 guests